Fabricate Structural Steel from China, Mexico and Canada (GDLSK represented the Chinese industry and U.S. customers)
R-134a from China
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from China
Ball Bearings from Korea
Steel Nails from Sri Lanka, India, Thailand, Oman, Turkey and Thailand (GDLSK represented Sri Lanka, India and U.S. customers)
Mobile Access Equipment from China (USITC decision was negative material injury, but affirmative threat, saving clients millions of dollars because of later effective date
Wind Towers from Vietnam; CIT reversed DOC on two complex substantive issues, and CAFC reversing CIT/DOC on two other issues, reducing investigation rate from 50% to de minimis, resulting in respondent being excluded from ADD Order;
Pipe from India; CIT reduced Annual Review ADD rate from 11.83 to zero;
Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China; CIT reversed DOC decisions that products are within scope of ADD/CVD Orders;
Solar Panels from China; CIT reversed DOC decisions that China’s refusal to respond to EBCP questions justified reliance on AFA for this program;
Nails from Taiwan; CIT reversed DOC AFA determination, reducing rate from 78.76% to zero;
Nails from China; CAFC reversed CIT decision that plaintiff had not exhausted administrative remedies, leading to reversal of DOC decision on effective date of scope decision;
Aluminum extrusions from China; CIT/CAFC reverse DOC on effective date of anticircumvention decision;
Nonwoven Ribbons from China; CAFC reversed DOC/CIT on ADD rate applicable to co-operative separate rate company;
PVLT from China; CAFC reversed DOC/CIT on selecting merely one respondent in an Annual Review;
Nails from Taiwan; CAFC reversed DOC/CIT twice as to DOC’s calculation of the denominator in its differential pricing analysis (ongoing; on fourth remand)
